这是好理解的，因为法国，北美，南美这三个阵营代表了革命力量，对应善良；而奥地利，英国，俄国则是当时反革命的力量，对应邪恶。
法国大革命形成的革命法国以及随后的拿破仑帝国，都是高度秩序化的政体，因此对应守序；南美革命的各国虽然都为了独立的共同目标，但却各自为阵，形成了不少派别跟山头，因此对应混乱；而北美独立的十三州为了追求独立合众成了联盟，但各州彼此的法律又互不相同，所以位于守序与混乱之间正好合适。
奥地利哈布斯堡王朝在当时是欧陆完善的封建体系的典型，以及战后梅特涅主导的维也纳体系，都是为了尽力维护过去封建制度秩序，因此对应守序；而沙俄就不同了，虽然俄皇也在奋力扑灭各地的革命与起义，但他的行动是完全没有章法的，基本上是指哪里打哪里，是以粗暴军事干预为主的，特别是战后他领导的神圣同盟，更显得他像个欧洲宪兵队长，因此对应混乱；英国则是首鼠两端，为了不让欧洲各国做大做强，一会儿联合奥地利俄国去镇压革命政体，一会儿又跟奥地利俄国都貌合神离，说白了其实只不过利用他俩当打手，来为英国自身的利益谋取最大化，所以对应中立邪恶。
再来看西班牙以及瑞典这两个阵营，它俩在革命与反革命的两大集团之前摇摆过，都曾与革命法国友好合作，比如西班牙与拿破仑结盟直到1808年才反目，而瑞典更是一度加入过拿破仑的大陆体系来对抗英国和俄国。但是两国最终都与法国闹翻，彻底倒向了反法联盟一方。因此西班牙瑞典对应的是中立，其中西班牙的君主制根基更为牢固，所以对应守序中立，瑞典则因为在当时有相当庞大的启蒙氛围，文人科学家层出不穷，瑞典君主通常都比较开明，往往任何事情都是以瑞典的利益为出发，与欧洲诸国保持周旋，因此对应混乱中立。
This is easy to understand because the three camps of France, North America, and South America represented the revolutionary forces, corresponding to goodness, while Austria, England, and Russia were the counter-revolutionary forces of the time, corresponding to evil.
The revolutionary France formed by the French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic Empire were highly ordered polities, so they corresponded to lawful order; the countries of the South American Revolution, although they all shared the common goal of independence, formed their own factions and mountains, so they corresponded to chaos; and the thirteen independent states of North America joined together into a union in pursuit of independence, but the laws of each state were different from each other, so they were located between order and chaos. So it was located between lawful order and chaos.
The Habsburg dynasty of Austria was a typical example of a perfect feudal system in Europe at that time, and the Vienna system led by Metternich after the war was to try to maintain the order of the feudal system in the past, so it corresponds to lawful order.The Tsarist Russia was different, although the Russian emperor was also fighting to put out revolutions and uprisings everywhere, but he acted lack of Regulations, basically, he was pointing to where to fight, and was based on brutal military intervention， The Holy Alliance he led after the war, especially after the war, more like a European gendarmerie captain, so corresponding to the chaos; Britain is the first two ends, in order to prevent the European countries to become bigger and stronger, a moment to unite with Austria and Russia to suppress the revolutionary regime, and a moment are seemingly in no harmony with Austria and Russia , in fact, only use them as a fighter, to maximize for Britain's own interests, so corresponding to the neutrality Evil.
Spain and Sweden, the two camps, both of them swayed before the two groups of revolutionary and counter-revolutionary, both had friendly cooperation with revolutionary France, such as Spain and Napoleon alliance until 1808, and Sweden was once joined Napoleon's continental system to fight against Britain and Russia. But both countries eventually fell out with France and completely fell to the side of the Anti-French Alliance. Therefore, Spain and Sweden corresponded to neutrality. Spain's monarchy was more firmly rooted, so it corresponded to orderly neutrality, while Sweden had a large Enlightenment atmosphere at that time, with many literary scientists, and the Swedish monarchs were usually more enlightened, often taking the interests of Sweden as the starting point for everything, and keeping up with the European countries, so it corresponded to chaotic neutrality.
|
